According to the research, intellectually disabled offenders are more likely to commit what type of offense?

Intellectually disabled offenders are often found to have a higher likelihood of committing non-violent offenses when supported by research in criminology and forensic psychology. These findings suggest that individuals with intellectual disabilities may not have the cognitive or social skills necessary to engage in complex criminal activities or understand the consequences of their actions fully.

Such offenders may become involved in non-violent crimes due to various factors, including peer influence, lack of understanding about the legality of their actions, or being easily manipulated by others. The nature of their cognitive functioning often limits their planning and decision-making abilities, which leads them to offenses that do not require a significant degree of premeditation or intent to harm. Examples of non-violent offenses may include theft, shoplifting, or other forms of property crimes where there is no intention to inflict physical harm on others.

This distinction is crucial for developing appropriate interventions and support systems tailored to the specific needs of intellectually disabled individuals who offend, rather than applying a blanket approach that may not effectively address their circumstances.