What does Calhoun and Weston (2003) suggest about inhibitors?

Calhoun and Weston (2003) propose that inhibitors play a crucial role in de-escalating potential violent situations. Inhibitors are defined as factors or elements that can prevent an individual from engaging in violent behavior. These might include internal constraints, such as moral beliefs and personal values, as well as external influences like social norms or support systems that promote non-violence.

By emphasizing the presence of inhibitors, the authors highlight the positive impact that certain conditions, relationships, or perspectives can have on a person's decision-making process, potentially steering them away from violence. This understanding is essential in violence prevention strategies, as it suggests that fostering environments where inhibitors are strengthened can effectively reduce risks of violence.

The other options do not align with this perspective; suggesting that inhibitors only apply in specific scenarios underestimates their broader utility, stating they always come from external sources ignores the internal factors that can inhibit aggression, and claiming they are ineffective in actual targeted violence cases dismisses their potential role in mitigating risk. Thus, the role of inhibitors as a means of de-escalation underscores the importance of proactive measures in threat management.